7 comments

Newt Gingrich = Batman

AMGer “Ayn Now” delivers a great piece of analogy in this thread.

He compares being a Republican in America to being in a foxhole, Mitt Romney to Charlie Brown, and Newt Gingrich to Batman.

I am way past tired of being on the reception end of abuse, and I have no way to strike back…and Newt has done so. frankly, I’d rather lose with someone who will draw blood, than lose with someone with good hair and money (who just will NOT punch back no matter what).
This is a war-and a very important war- and I don’t want Charlie Brown in my foxhole- I want Batman-even if he is flawed.

4 comments

My favorite Romney joke so far.

Seen, of all places, in the comments section of a YouTube video:

“Willard Romney even flip-flopped on his own name!”

In the endless “welfare fraud” thread (the one which will get CV43 booted off AMG for challenging Naran), AMGer “towncrier” offers up this stellar defense of Frugal Fanny that truly is dizzying in its’ awesomeness. Enjoy!

“Huh CV I don’t believe I was mentioning any names there. Me thinks you PROTEST TOO MUCH and now that you feel so damn guilty, I read back from when you came into this thread and you really seem very confusing on your statements. Naran knows of what she spaeks as she is very intuned to the goings on in the state when it comes to a lot of the news topics. So when she tells you just to look through the PPH or LST. she knows what she is saying. BTW the BDN also marches to the Dem’s drumbeat too. So my suggestion is, Ya Might want to read the PPH, LST and the BDN back in 2009 and 2010 and I’ll bet you’ll find the stoies she was talking about.”

This one’s get everything!

1. Shakespeare
2. Misspelled words
3. Blatant brown-nosing

Really, does AMG get any better than this?

http://www.asmainegoes.com/content/ok-just-little-too-much-welfare-abuse

AMGer Stephen Carmichael, commenting about the alleged enhancement of the wheelbarrow-load of postcards delivered to Governor LePage by union officials, says, “Apparently reporting the facts doesn’t sell papers, so they excaudate the truth.”

Now, since this thread was initiated by FLAMMENWERFER (capital letters his), I suppose Stephen felt it necessary to to employ very erudite discourse in his missive.  Bruce Libby, of course, has never felt compelled to do so.

But, gosh, Stephen’s statement is above my pay grade.  Could someone please tell me what he meant?

AMGer “pmconusa” posted a five paragraph exposition on the state of our civilization. It is pretty intense:

What you are witnessing is just the next stop on the road to extinction. If you look around you will see where we are going because others are further along the road and others, like the Egyptians, the Greeks, the Mayans, the Incas and the Romans have already disappeared. We are not satisfied with what nature provides but compete with each other in our gluttony to consume more.

Whoa. That’s heavy. Feel free to sit down and have a cup of dark tea while you ponder the impending extinction of America.

Have you managed to absorb all that yet?

Good, because there is more.

Like it or not the earth’s resources and natures continuing bounty are finite. In order to get what we need and protect what we have we stake out our territory and supposedly provide for its defense by establishing an elite group (government), allow it to make the rules for our protection and go about our merry way assuming that group will be satisfied with just having their needs satisfied but we don’t protect ourselves from the very ones we enabled to protect us.

Oh my god. He’s right. I’m not protecting myself from the very ones I enabled to protect me. How did I not see this before?

While the rest of us go about our merry way using up what nature has provided, the government has taken care of themselves and their friends at our expense. Countries no longer war with each other to get what they want because the price is too high. Instead, their disgruntled inhabitants migrate where the opportunity lies and as long as there is a surplus their encroachment is not suspected until it is too late. In less than two or three generations there will be no more ethnic Russians, in three most of Europe, including the United Kingdom will be governed by Muslims whose themselves or their parents migrated from the middle east or Africa where all but the oil has long been insufficient to sustain their populations.

A world with no more Russians? Holy Shit. Muslims governing Europe? Wow. Sound the alarms.

Wait- will there still be Russian Muslims??

Closer to home you have the story of the American Indian. Not a homogeneous race, but several races scattered all over the North American continent. They were stripped of their property by force or by cunning. They were slaughtered or isolated in enclaves as are the Palestinians today and they will soon die out, or be absorbed to where they no longer have an identity apart.

Those poor American Indians. They are just like the Palestinians, sans rockets.

Okay – sarcasm off. Guess what this weird speech was about? I’m serious, just take a moment to try and guess.

You are never going to believe it. But go on, guess.

No, that’s not it.

Not that either.

Are you ready?

It is about fricking K-Marts closing! I’m serious! K-MART! The Romans, the protectors we enabled who we need protection from, the Palestinians, the Indians, the Russians and the Muslims… All of that is tied together with K-MART closing some fricking stores! I’m not making this up.

The stores are in retreat because their customers, whom they rely on for survival, either don’t have the money to spend, cannot earn it where they are, or have moved to where the work is.
We have one last opportunity for hope and change and it isn’t Obama and the Democrats. Nor is it the Republicans. The rules laid down in the Constitution are sufficient if we put enough teeth in them, get both the President and the Supreme Court out of the legislative business and severely punish legislators who disobey the rules. Then we go after the state governments and do the same.

I’ve read a lot of bullshit Constitutional Ron Paul-esque arguments over the years on AMG, but this one takes the cake. This grown man (or woman) is saying that if we had followed a strict interpretation of the Constitution we wouldn’t have to worry about our local K-Mart closing. And apparently the Russians would be better off too (they might still exist?), but that’s not as important as the goddamn K-MART!

You. Cannot. Make. This. Up.

7 comments

Best (worst). Thread. Ever.

In which the collective intellect of Watcher, Apollo, Roger Ek, Tom C, Tracy G and the fabulous MD Harmon attempt to explain what liberals are. The (seemingly) only liberal left allowed to post on AMG, NancyEH, gets in a shot but is quickly insulted by Islander who says that must be a teacher. That’s right, Islander, educated people usually are liberal.

Anyway, enjoy!

http://www.asmainegoes.com/content/i-need-help-understanding-liberals

0 comments

M.D. Harmon isn’t big on details.

Portland Press Herald opinion writer M.D. Harmon is spending time today googling anything former President Bush said about the Taliban to try and somehow prove to the internets that Joe Biden was wrong to suggest that the Taliban was not our enemy. He is posting his results on AMG.

I would note that the Vice President was referring abstractly to the notion that we have to negotiate a peace with the Taliban because they are a big constituency in Afghanistan, whether we like it or not. This is reality. Reality has a well known Democratic bias, but it is what it is.

Of course, conservatives think reality should bend to them rather than the other way around. Only weak-kneed bleeding hearts let reality drive them into doing something they didn’t prefer from the get-go. And besides, anything mentioning the word “negotiate” or “compromise” is thoroughly un-Republican, so Mr. Harmon’s knee jerked out faster than you can say “lesser of two evils.”

Harmon found several quotes supposedly supporting his thesis, but the first he found, I thought, summed up President George W. Bush’s legacy and Republican reality-rejection quite nicely.

Here is how Mr. Harmon put it:

Found this in a 15-second search on Google on a site called RightWingQuotes: “And you all also may remember that early on, I said if you hide a terrorist, if you feed a terrorist, if you provide comfort to a terrorist, you’re just as guilty as the terrorist. The Taliban now knows what we mean. They’re gone. And, guess what? People in Afghanistan don’t miss them one bit.” — George W. Bush rallies the troops in Alaska on 2/16/02″

The word enemy isn’t there, but the concept certainly is.

Ok. Great. Bush didn’t like the Taliban. No one does, excepting the people who actually live in Afghanistan outside of Kabul. We certainly shouldn’t take anything they think into account, right?

Isn’t it fitting that this quote is brought out to attack Biden but has a huge, gaping failure of understanding right smack in the middle of it?

If the Taliban were “gone,” as Bush said, we wouldn’t still be in Afghanistan! This wouldn’t be an issue and we could stop pouring money into another foreign country, bring our troops home, and rebuild America.

But it wasn’t true. It isn’t true. They were not gone then, and are not gone now.

Therefore, the Democratic administration must be the grown ups who accept reality and deal with the world as it is, not as it is imagined in the minds of the right-wing talk show hosts. And by “grown-ups” I mean only those people who abide by the very low standard that foreign policy isn’t all about unzipping your pants, smashing your dick on the table and saying “Isn’t it huge?”

Joe Biden, grown up, accepts the reality that some negotiations will help get us out of Afghanistan in the next ten years. Republican non-reality creates foreign policy based on myths, chest-thumping, and stupidity, leading to a bash on the other side for daring to suggest that we think about negotiating with the same bad guys their man theoretically eradicated nine long years ago.

If Republican theory were true, Afghanistan ought to be a utopia by now. After all they have no regulations, no liberal activist judges, and definitely no Taliban. Why are we still there?

The Taliban isn’t gone. Citing the guy who said they were gone nine years ago doesn’t make me think your side is good at foreign policy.

I’ll admit that I don’t read AMG as much as I used to since I was banned for life, but it seems that without a few dissidents in attendance there is a distinct lack of controversy any more.

Where are the discussions about whether or not there are more people on welfare than paying taxes?  How about some discourse about what Forbes magazine really told the governor?  Maybe a discussion about how he regards the legislative process.  Or whether Kathleen Sebelius really is ready to give Maine a waiver to decimate its healthcare system.

It seems that Naran has wielded her wooden spoon to the point of making AMG totally boring.  I mean, how can we find outrageous statements to ridicule if nobody provokes them?